Post by RD Sandman Post by First-Post Post by needtruth Post by !Jones Post by meport Post by Wayne Post by !Jones
Jeff Sessions doesn't have a problem with talking to Russians
anymore than Bill Clinton had a legal problem with an adult,
consensual, private sexual encounter. Jeff may talk to Russians
just like anyone else may; Jeff may join hands with them and
dance the Kamarinskaya, for all anyone cares. Furthermore, lots
of politicians have sex with their interns and, so long as the
intern is of age, it's nobody's business but theirs.
Where Bill had a legal problem was when he knowingly lied under
oath about it. He didn't *have* to answer that question, but he
chose to do so. (I'm guessing that it would have cum out
Sessions has a similar issue.
If you ever try to obtain a security clearance, it's OK (within
reason) to have e blemish on your record... just don't try to hide
Post by meport Post by Wayne Post by !Jones
Sessions: "Of course I have talked to the Russians; that's part
of my job. I do that all of the time and have done so for
years." Matter closed. Jeff lied about it; *now* he has a
problem. He has a
Post by meport Post by Wayne Post by !Jones
because he lied under oath, not because he talked to a Russian.
As with many of the "controversies", this one reeks of pure politics.
Wrong. It's about defending our Constitution. It's about
protecting our voting process. It's about defending our National
Security against a direct attack much, much more dangerous that
9/11 ever was and ever could be. Politics doesn't even enter into
the calculus of this "controversy".
Actually, it most certainly does. As did the Clinton blowjobs.
Getting a blowjob from the office bimbo is just plain stupid. Aiding
a foreign government in their attempts to undermine our Constitution
is treason. Clinton was a stupid asshole for getting the blowjob and
then stretching the truth beyond belief after getting caught. No real
crime there. Sessions committing perjury by lying under oath before a
Congressional Committee he was testifying before about his treasonous
activities is a felony that could get Sessions thrown into the Super
Max at Florence, Colorado with all the other dirt bags for the rest of
his natural existence.
Based upon what evidence dumb shit?
List what hard evidence there is against Sessions, Trump and even
You can't because there is none.
Funny how you immensely stupid morons accept any accusations against
the new administration as being fact without a shred of proof but are
now screaming bloody murder for all of the proof in the world (even
though former Obama staff has openly admitted to it) that Obama's
thugs wiretapped Trump's offices and associates.
I haven't seen that and I have been following this crap fairly closely.
I am not saying that no one has claimed it but just that I haven't seen
where someone other than Trump has officially claimed it.
Well, now it is more than just being claimed:
And then there's this:
On a side note regarding wiretapping, this should scare the hell out
of any normal American.: https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
Post by RD Sandman Post by First-Post
You dumb asses have become so desperately unhinged that you can't even
stick with your own reasoning from one minute to the next.
Keep on acting like petulant little elementary school brats. It only
serves to help you look like hypocritical trash that much more to the
Damn, you need to say what you really think. ;)
The libs are going just flat out spastic now.
They don't need proof that Russia did anything to blame them for
Hillary's election loss but need more than empirical evidence that
Trump was wiretapped even though their own media published the fact
last fall and now there is proof that Lynch signed off on the
They told us that we were worrying about nothing over Obama's "if you
like your plan, you can keep your plan" lie and now their biggest
concern over a replacement for Obamacare is whether or not people can
keep their plan.
They are making death threats to the new president on nearly a daily
basis but want to whine about how much more Trump's security costs
than Obama's because of those threats.
And right at 30 democratic politicians that have ranted and raved over
Trump or his team even speaking to a Russian while denying that they
EVER made so much as eye contact with any Russians have been found to
have been a lot thicker with them than any of the Trump administration
ever has and they're still pitching their little hissy fits over
unsubstantiated accusations alone.
So yes, to those other than the bat shit stupid crazy liberal
sycophants, they look like nothing more than lying hypocritical