Michael Ejercito
2017-06-19 17:47:32 UTC
by David Sims
IT HAS BEEN CLAIMED that since Blacks in America (who are, on average,
significantly part-White) have an average IQ of about 85, they will do
about as well as an 85-IQ segment selected from any other race,
including the White race. But that isnt true.
Those who make that claim neglect two important things: First, there
are factors involved besides IQ. One of them is the hormone-driven
tendency of Blacks to go after what they want in a violently
aggressive way. White US residents and Black US residents, matched for
socio-economic status and for IQ, will for that reason still not
exhibit the same behaviors, generally speaking.
And the greater criminality of the Blacks will land a higher
proportion of them in jails and in prisons, as compared with their
White counterparts.
Second, there is the well-known genetic phenomenon of regression
toward the (racial) mean. Everyone has both dominant and recessive
genes, but what gets expressed are, mostly, the dominant ones. If you
select only stupid people from a smart race, their stupidity is the
result of their having poor-quality dominant genes for intelligence.
Their recessive genes are still a random mix. If you could somehow
reverse the dominant-recessive polarity of that sample of people,
theyd suddenly have a distribution of IQ that was the same as that of
their race.
Now if you were to do that with stupid people from a stupid race,
theyd still be stupid after that dominant-recessive transformation.
While it is probably true that both stupid Whites and stupid Blacks
would show equal incompetence at jobs that require a higher degree of
mental acuity than they have, the same isnt true of their children
and grandchildren. Sexual reproduction makes a new shuffle of the
genetic dice with each child born. That means the children of the
White dummies wont be as dumb as their parents were, but the children
of the Black dummies probably will be as dumb as their parents were,
considering their 85-IQ group average. The offspring will to some
degree regress to the mean, or average, of their respective races.
This is also true of the offspring of unusually intelligent Blacks.
This has huge societal implications.
Its been claimed that almost 20% of Blacks are smarter than the
average White. Id like to know where they got that figure. I think
that percentage is about twice what the true percentage is.
The average IQ for the United States is 98, according to (if I
remember correctly) IQ and the Wealth of Nations, 2002, by Richard
Lynn. But if you remove the Blacks, Mestizos, and Asians from the
statistical population, the average IQ of White Americans, X, is:
0.13(85) + 0.15(92) + 0.04(105) + 0.68(X) = 98 X = 101.4
The fraction, f, of a race having an average IQ of x¯ and a standard
deviation in IQ of s, which is above the minimum IQ of µ: f(µ) =
[sv(2p)]?¹ ?(µ,8) exp{ -[(x-x¯)/s]²/2 } dx
Taking advantage of the normal distributions symmetry, we make it
more easily integrable: f(µ) = ½ - [sv(2p)]?¹ ?(x¯,µ) exp{
-[(x-x¯)/s]²/2 } dx
You can avoid integrating the probability density function if you have
a handy error function to call: f(µ) = 1 - ½ { 1 + erf [(µ-x¯)/(sv2)]
}
This is the equation that The Bell Curve analysis of racial
distributions for IQ is based upon.
If you assume that Blacks have an average IQ of 85.0 and a standard
deviation in IQ of 14 points, and that Whites have an average IQ of
101.4 and a standard deviation in IQ of 16 points (there are studies
that show Whites as having a larger s than Blacks do), then the
percentage of Blacks who have IQs that exceed the White average is
12.1%.
Using the same input, you can calculate that for each Black genius
(with an IQ of 140 or higher) found in a random sample of Black US
residents, you will find 185 geniuses in a random sample of White US
residents of equal population size.
Since Whites outnumber Blacks by a ratio of about five to one, White
geniuses will outnumber Black geniuses in a demographically average
part of the United States by a ratio of 927.
So, if an employer in that area is hiring people to do genius-level
work, he will (having no racial bias whatever) gain himself 927 times
more new White employees than new Black employees. With a ratio that
high, it might easily turn out that he didnt hire any Blacks at all.
That isnt racism. Thats just how it is.
IT HAS BEEN CLAIMED that since Blacks in America (who are, on average,
significantly part-White) have an average IQ of about 85, they will do
about as well as an 85-IQ segment selected from any other race,
including the White race. But that isnt true.
Those who make that claim neglect two important things: First, there
are factors involved besides IQ. One of them is the hormone-driven
tendency of Blacks to go after what they want in a violently
aggressive way. White US residents and Black US residents, matched for
socio-economic status and for IQ, will for that reason still not
exhibit the same behaviors, generally speaking.
And the greater criminality of the Blacks will land a higher
proportion of them in jails and in prisons, as compared with their
White counterparts.
Second, there is the well-known genetic phenomenon of regression
toward the (racial) mean. Everyone has both dominant and recessive
genes, but what gets expressed are, mostly, the dominant ones. If you
select only stupid people from a smart race, their stupidity is the
result of their having poor-quality dominant genes for intelligence.
Their recessive genes are still a random mix. If you could somehow
reverse the dominant-recessive polarity of that sample of people,
theyd suddenly have a distribution of IQ that was the same as that of
their race.
Now if you were to do that with stupid people from a stupid race,
theyd still be stupid after that dominant-recessive transformation.
While it is probably true that both stupid Whites and stupid Blacks
would show equal incompetence at jobs that require a higher degree of
mental acuity than they have, the same isnt true of their children
and grandchildren. Sexual reproduction makes a new shuffle of the
genetic dice with each child born. That means the children of the
White dummies wont be as dumb as their parents were, but the children
of the Black dummies probably will be as dumb as their parents were,
considering their 85-IQ group average. The offspring will to some
degree regress to the mean, or average, of their respective races.
This is also true of the offspring of unusually intelligent Blacks.
This has huge societal implications.
Its been claimed that almost 20% of Blacks are smarter than the
average White. Id like to know where they got that figure. I think
that percentage is about twice what the true percentage is.
The average IQ for the United States is 98, according to (if I
remember correctly) IQ and the Wealth of Nations, 2002, by Richard
Lynn. But if you remove the Blacks, Mestizos, and Asians from the
statistical population, the average IQ of White Americans, X, is:
0.13(85) + 0.15(92) + 0.04(105) + 0.68(X) = 98 X = 101.4
The fraction, f, of a race having an average IQ of x¯ and a standard
deviation in IQ of s, which is above the minimum IQ of µ: f(µ) =
[sv(2p)]?¹ ?(µ,8) exp{ -[(x-x¯)/s]²/2 } dx
Taking advantage of the normal distributions symmetry, we make it
more easily integrable: f(µ) = ½ - [sv(2p)]?¹ ?(x¯,µ) exp{
-[(x-x¯)/s]²/2 } dx
You can avoid integrating the probability density function if you have
a handy error function to call: f(µ) = 1 - ½ { 1 + erf [(µ-x¯)/(sv2)]
}
This is the equation that The Bell Curve analysis of racial
distributions for IQ is based upon.
If you assume that Blacks have an average IQ of 85.0 and a standard
deviation in IQ of 14 points, and that Whites have an average IQ of
101.4 and a standard deviation in IQ of 16 points (there are studies
that show Whites as having a larger s than Blacks do), then the
percentage of Blacks who have IQs that exceed the White average is
12.1%.
Using the same input, you can calculate that for each Black genius
(with an IQ of 140 or higher) found in a random sample of Black US
residents, you will find 185 geniuses in a random sample of White US
residents of equal population size.
Since Whites outnumber Blacks by a ratio of about five to one, White
geniuses will outnumber Black geniuses in a demographically average
part of the United States by a ratio of 927.
So, if an employer in that area is hiring people to do genius-level
work, he will (having no racial bias whatever) gain himself 927 times
more new White employees than new Black employees. With a ratio that
high, it might easily turn out that he didnt hire any Blacks at all.
That isnt racism. Thats just how it is.